JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 19, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Benedicto Rincon Acosta

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Conocimiento para resolverlo debe ser expreso
Corte Constitucional
  • Inaplicación del precepto constitucional
  • No puede arrogarse competencias para llenar vacíos legislativos
  • Organo aplicador de la Constitución
Sala Disciplinaria Del Consejo Superior De La Judicatura
  • Dirime conflictos de competencia entre distintas jurisdicciones
Estado Social De Derecho
  • Posición jurídica del individuo o del funcionario público
8 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se desató el conflicto suscitado entre el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Norte de Santander y el Juzgado Segundo Laboral del Circuito de Cúcuta en la acción de tutela promovida por el ciudadano de la referencia contra el Seguro Social (Jefatura de Recursos Humanos), Seccional Cúcuta, en el sentido de que su tramitación corresponde al Tribunal mencionado, a quien se ordena remitir el expediente en forma inmediata para los fines legales.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Dirimir el conflicto suscitado entre el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Norte de Santander y el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Laboral del Circuito de Cucuta en la accion de tutela promovida por el ciudadano Benedicto Rincon Acosta contra el Seguro Social (Jefatura de Recursos Humanos), Seccional Cucuta, en el sentido de que su tramitacion corresponde al Tribunal mencionado, a quien se ordena remitir el expediente en forma inmediata para los fines legales.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.